3/31/2023 0 Comments Fabfilter twin 2 chorus![]() ![]() The collection fee can be found in the returns information on each product's page on Gear4music. We can collect your return for a small fee, or you can send it back to us yourself. Reeds and mouthpieces for woodwind and brass instruments ![]() Important: For hygiene and software licensing reasons, some items are only eligible for our Money Back Guarantee if they are returned to us unused and sealed in the original packaging with all software still "unregistered." Details of exclusions are shown within the product descriptions. Please keep hold of all the original packaging until you're sure you want to keep the order. Keeping in mind this is 24 oscillators vs 256 oscillators.Īll in all, even though this wasn’t entirely scientific I think its safe to say that Twin 3 is quite a bit more efficient overall.If you decide your order isn't suitable for any reason you can return it - just let us know within 30 days of receiving it. Pigments is getting about 15% with the analog engine and 20% with wavetables. Twin 3 is getting 8-10% in normal mode and 23-27% in high quality. Pigments has a max of 8 voices in unison mode and 32 polyphony. I think that would technically mean 256 oscillators playing at once. On the standard Analog engine (three oscillators per engine totaling 7 oscillators) I’m getting 14 to 15% on Pigments.įinal test is really stress testing this. I’m getting 39 to 40% on Pigments with 2 wavetable engines and 1 oscillator in the utility section. I’m getting 4% in normal mode and 9 - 10% on high quality mode with Twin 3. Again, this is an 8 note chord with just sine waves. Thats 4 oscillators on Twin 3 and 3 wavetable Oscillators or 7 analog style oscillators on Pigments. Next I’m doing the same test but with all the oscillators turned on for each synth. Twin 3 is sitting at 4% CPU in normal quality and 7 to 8% in high quality. Next I’m trying one sine oscillator and no modulations and no effects and doing an 8 note chord. ![]() ![]() With no notes playing the Twin 3 is sitting at 1%, basically unaffecting the CPU and Pigments is sitting around 3 and 4%. I have an Intel i9 9900k processor with 32GB of RAM and I’m running it on Ableton at 256 samples and 48khz. I don’t think Pigments can do that, not sure how many other synths can. You can even have multiple keyboard modulation sources so if you want something to be effected linearly or something else to be effect logarithmically you can do that which I thought was neat. 6 LFOs, 6 Envelopes, and a handful of other parameters. In total I was able to add about 30 I believe. Oh, almost forgot to mention modulation sources. I think just the ease of the interface is worth check it out. It has a familiar intuitive Fabfilter workflow so if you’ve used literally any of their other plug-ins this works the same. I didn’t ever mess around with Twin 2 but I am liking what I’m hearing out of Twin 3. 4 multi mode filters that can be ran in serial, parallel, or one per oscillator, can also be panned. 4 analog style oscillators (that can be panned). I’ve been messing around with the demo and truthfully it’s a fairly basic synth. I know we don’t talk much about VSTs here but I figured this deserved it’s own thread as Fabfilter are leaders in the software business. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |